FridayOL

Madrid, Spain – In a significant development within the ongoing controversy surrounding Isabel Díaz Ayuso, the former head of the Madrid regional government's cybersecurity department, García Ortiz, has formally requested the Supreme Court to archive the case against her. Ortiz argues that the investigation has failed to produce any concrete evidence implicating Ayuso or her associates, and instead points towards the boyfriend of the Madrid regional president and his network as the likely source of the sensitive information leaks.

According to a document submitted to the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court, which Europa Press has reviewed, Ortiz contends that the investigation has been fruitless in uncovering any incriminating evidence. The request highlights a lack of substantial progress and questions the direction of the inquiry.

The core of Ortiz’s argument centers on the assertion that the leaks originated from within the social circle of Ayuso’s boyfriend, Manuel Díaz. He suggests that individuals connected to Díaz may have been responsible for disseminating confidential information, potentially aiming to damage Ayuso’s reputation and political standing.

A Complex Investigation: The case has been shrouded in complexity since it began, involving allegations of data breaches and misuse of government information. The initial focus was on whether Ayuso or her close associates had improperly benefited from sensitive data related to COVID-19 procurement contracts. However, the investigation has reportedly struggled to establish a clear link between Ayuso and any wrongdoing.

Ortiz's Role and Previous Statements: García Ortiz's involvement in the case is noteworthy, as he previously served as a key figure in the cybersecurity department. His request to the Supreme Court carries considerable weight, given his insider knowledge of the department's operations and data security protocols. Prior to this request, Ortiz had already expressed concerns about the direction of the investigation, suggesting that it had become overly politicized and lacked a clear factual basis.

Potential Implications: The Supreme Court’s decision on Ortiz’s request will have significant implications for the future of the case and the political landscape in Madrid. If the court grants the request and archives the case, it would represent a major setback for those seeking to hold Ayuso accountable. Conversely, if the court rejects the request, the investigation could continue, potentially uncovering new evidence and further complicating Ayuso’s position.

Political Fallout: The controversy has already triggered significant political fallout, with opposition parties calling for Ayuso's resignation. The allegations of data breaches and improper influence have damaged Ayuso’s reputation and fueled public debate about transparency and accountability in government. The ongoing legal proceedings and Ortiz’s latest request are expected to further intensify the political tensions surrounding the case.

Looking Ahead: The Supreme Court’s deliberations are expected to be closely watched by legal experts, political analysts, and the public alike. The decision will not only determine the fate of this particular case but also set a precedent for future investigations involving high-ranking government officials. The focus now shifts to the Supreme Court, as it weighs the evidence and considers the arguments presented by García Ortiz.