FridayOL

PETALING JAYA: Sisters in Islam (SIS) has firmly refuted claims that its judicial review of a controversial fatwa labeling the organization and its affiliated group, SIS Forum (Malaysia), as “deviant” constitutes an attack on Islam. In a statement released today, SIS emphasized that seeking legal recourse is a legitimate and necessary step to clarify and defend its interpretation of Islamic principles, and does not undermine the faith itself.

The fatwa, issued previously, has drawn widespread criticism for its broad and potentially damaging implications. SIS Forum (Malaysia) and its co-founder initiated the legal challenge, arguing that the fatwa is unconstitutional and infringes upon their rights to freedom of expression and association. SIS has consistently maintained that its work promoting women's rights within an Islamic framework is aligned with core Islamic values and principles of justice and equality.

“We want to be very clear: this legal action is not an attack on Islam,” stated a spokesperson for SIS. “It is a defense of our right to interpret and practice Islam in a way that is inclusive, progressive, and just. Seeking clarification through the legal system is a vital mechanism for ensuring the integrity and proper application of Islamic teachings.”

The organization highlighted that judicial review is a fundamental pillar of the Malaysian legal system, designed to scrutinize the actions of public bodies, including religious authorities. It argued that the fatwa, by labeling SIS as “deviant,” potentially restricts its ability to engage in legitimate dialogue and advocacy work, ultimately hindering the broader understanding and practice of Islam.

SIS also pointed out that the concept of “deviance” within Islamic jurisprudence is complex and requires careful consideration. It asserted that the fatwa lacked sufficient justification and relied on a narrow and potentially biased interpretation of Islamic sources. The organization believes that a judicial review will provide an opportunity to present its perspective and demonstrate the compatibility of its work with Islamic principles.

“We believe that a robust and open discussion about Islamic teachings is essential for a vibrant and evolving Muslim community,” the spokesperson added. “This legal challenge is part of that ongoing dialogue, and we are confident that the court will recognize the importance of protecting freedom of expression and upholding the principles of justice and fairness within the context of Islamic law.”

The case is expected to attract significant public attention and could have far-reaching implications for the relationship between religious authorities, civil society organizations, and the Malaysian legal system. SIS remains committed to pursuing the legal challenge and defending its right to advocate for women's rights within an Islamic framework, while reaffirming its unwavering commitment to the principles of Islam.

The organization continues to urge the public to understand the nuances of the situation and to refrain from making judgments based on incomplete information. SIS encourages open and respectful dialogue about Islamic issues and believes that legal processes are an essential tool for ensuring the protection of rights and the promotion of a just and equitable society.