FridayOL

Beirut, Lebanon - In a fiery statement released on Wednesday, Hezbollah condemned the Lebanese government’s recent decision to instruct the army to establish a state monopoly on arms, labeling it a “serious error” with potentially destabilizing consequences. This move has reignited a long-standing and deeply divisive debate within Lebanon regarding the control and distribution of weaponry.

The decision, formally outlined in a government directive, aims to consolidate all arms within the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), effectively disarming all other entities. Proponents argue this is essential for national security, stability, and the prevention of internal conflict. They believe a unified military force is the only way to guarantee Lebanon's sovereignty and protect its citizens.

However, Hezbollah, a powerful Shia political and military organization, views the move as a direct threat to its own existence and influence. The group maintains its own arsenal, which it claims is necessary to deter Israeli aggression and protect Lebanon from external threats. Hezbollah's statement asserted that the decision undermines the country's defense capabilities and ignores the realities of the regional security landscape.

“This directive is a grave mistake and a dangerous step that weakens Lebanon’s ability to defend itself,” the statement read. “It ignores the critical role Hezbollah plays in protecting Lebanon from Israeli aggression and undermines the sacrifices made by our fighters.”

The controversy highlights the complex and precarious political situation in Lebanon, where Hezbollah wields significant power and influence. The group’s armed presence has been a source of contention both domestically and internationally, with some countries accusing it of destabilizing the region.

The government's decision has also drawn criticism from other political factions, although not as vocally as Hezbollah's opposition. Concerns have been raised about the feasibility of disarming all non-state actors and the potential for increased tensions and violence. Some fear that the move could trigger a backlash from Hezbollah and other armed groups, further destabilizing the country.

Analysts suggest that the government’s decision was likely driven by pressure from international actors, particularly the United States, which has long called for Hezbollah’s disarmament. However, implementing such a policy in Lebanon’s deeply fragmented political landscape presents a formidable challenge.

The future of Lebanon remains uncertain as the country grapples with economic crisis, political instability, and the ongoing threat of regional conflict. The arms monopoly decision has added another layer of complexity to the situation, and its impact on Lebanon's fragile peace remains to be seen. The Lebanese government faces a delicate balancing act in attempting to assert its authority while navigating the powerful interests of Hezbollah and other armed groups.

The situation is being closely watched by regional and international powers, as Lebanon’s stability is crucial for the wider Middle East.