FridayOL

PETALING JAYA: The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) has issued a firm rebuttal to claims made by former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad regarding the validity of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s pardon. The AGC’s statement categorically refutes Dr Mahathir's assertions, affirming that the pardon process followed due legal procedures and is entirely valid.

Dr Mahathir had previously questioned the legality of Anwar Ibrahim's pardon, suggesting potential flaws in the process. However, the AGC’s response aims to dispel these doubts and provide clarity on the matter. The pardon, granted in 2023, effectively quashed Anwar's previous conviction related to charges dating back to the 1990s.

A Detailed Explanation from AGC

In a detailed statement, the AGC explained that the decision to grant the pardon was made following a thorough review of the case and was based on considerations of public interest and the principles of restorative justice. They emphasized that the pardon was not a reflection on the original conviction itself but rather a recognition of the time that has passed and the broader context surrounding the case.

“The pardon was granted after careful consideration of all relevant factors, including the length of time that has elapsed since the conviction, Anwar Ibrahim's subsequent contributions to society, and the potential for reconciliation and healing within the nation,” the AGC stated. They further clarified that the pardon process adheres to Article 160 of the Federal Constitution, which outlines the powers of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (King) in granting pardons.

Legal Precedence and Constitutional Authority

The AGC’s response also highlighted the constitutional authority of the King to grant pardons, citing numerous past instances where similar powers have been exercised. They emphasized that the King's decision is not subject to judicial review, reinforcing the legitimacy of the pardon.

“The Yang di-Pertuan Agong’s power to grant pardons is enshrined in the Federal Constitution and has been consistently upheld by the courts. This power is exercised on the advice of the Pardons Board, which comprises respected legal and judicial figures,” the AGC added.

Addressing Public Concerns

The AGC’s statement is likely aimed at addressing public concerns and potentially calming any political unrest that may have arisen from Dr Mahathir’s claims. By providing a clear and comprehensive explanation, the AGC hopes to reassure the public that the pardon was granted in accordance with the law and in the best interests of the nation.

Dr Mahathir's Continued Scrutiny

While the AGC’s response is definitive, it remains to be seen whether Dr Mahathir will retract his claims or offer further commentary on the matter. His continued scrutiny could potentially prolong the debate and fuel further speculation. However, the AGC's thorough explanation provides a strong legal foundation for the validity of Anwar Ibrahim’s pardon.

This development underscores the ongoing political dynamics within Malaysia and the sensitivity surrounding historical legal cases. The AGC's swift and decisive response demonstrates its commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring transparency in matters of public importance.