FridayOL

Kolkata, India – Amidst a wave of criticism regarding the arrest of 22-year-old social media influencer Sharmishtha Panoli concerning a post related to 'Operation Sindoor,' the Kolkata Police have issued a comprehensive clarification defending their actions. The police maintain that the content in question crossed the line from protected speech into abusive language, and that the arrest was a necessary response to maintain public order and prevent incitement.

The controversy erupted after Panoli shared a post on her social media platform that many deemed offensive and derogatory. 'Operation Sindoor' refers to a recent initiative aimed at supporting women entrepreneurs in West Bengal, and Panoli’s post allegedly targeted individuals involved in the program, using abusive and inflammatory language.

In their detailed statement released on Sunday, the Kolkata Police emphasized that freedom of speech is a fundamental right, but it is not absolute. They asserted that the right to express oneself does not extend to using abusive language, inciting hatred, or defaming individuals or groups. The police cited specific sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) under which Panoli was charged, including those related to defamation and promoting enmity between different groups.

“We understand that there are concerns about the arrest and the potential impact on freedom of expression,” stated a Kolkata Police spokesperson. “However, we must also uphold the law and ensure that public spaces, both online and offline, remain safe and respectful. The content shared by Ms. Panoli was not merely critical; it was deeply offensive and crossed the threshold of acceptable discourse.”

The police also clarified that the investigation is ongoing and that they are committed to ensuring a fair and impartial process. They urged the public to refrain from spreading misinformation and to respect the due process of law. They added that social media platforms have a responsibility to moderate content and prevent the spread of harmful material, and that the police are working with these platforms to address such issues.

The arrest has sparked a heated debate on social media, with opinions sharply divided. Some have expressed solidarity with Panoli, arguing that the arrest is an overreach of state power and a suppression of dissent. Others have defended the police action, stating that Panoli’s post was irresponsible and harmful, and that it deserved to be addressed.

Legal experts have weighed in on the case, noting that the courts will ultimately decide whether the arrest and charges were justified. They emphasized the importance of balancing freedom of speech with the need to protect individuals and communities from harm. The case is expected to be closely watched as it could set a precedent for how social media content is regulated in India.

The Kolkata Police reiterated their commitment to upholding the law and protecting the rights of all citizens, while also emphasizing the importance of responsible online behavior. They called on citizens to engage in constructive dialogue and to avoid using social media as a platform for abuse and harassment.